Blog

  • Persichetti’s WINTER CANTATA

    persichetti

    I had fallen in love with Vincent Persichetti’s WINTER CANTATA which I had discovered quite by chance when I plucked a CD of the composer’s choral works off the shelf at the library many moons ago.

    Composed in 1964, the work was inspired by a collection of haiku (‘A Net of Fireflies‘) which Persichetti’s daughter had given him as a gift. To the intriguingly spare accompaniment of flute and marimba, the chorus of women’s voices weave a magical tapestry of wintry images. Intricate harmonies and tapering sustained notes are particularly pleasing vocal elements; the flute and marimba evoke cool air and gently swirling flakes of snow. There are eleven brief movements, and an Epilogue which draws its text from one line of each of the previous eleven poems.

    Listen to the cantata here:

  • PAGLIACCI – Metropolitan Opera Record Club ~ 1958

    guarrera

    Above: Frank Guarrera

    During the pandemic, all sorts of operatic treasures had popped up on YouTube. I think that the collectors who have their own channels are finding time to post more, digging deep into their archives. It’s such a boon for music lovers, who – up til then – had been mostly deprived of live in-venue performances..

    Here we have Leoncavallo’s PAGLIACCI from a recording made in 1958 for the Metropolitan Opera Record Club. All of the singers in the cast were dear to me in my earliest days of opera fandom.

    Listen here.

  • Mira Zakai’s haunting “Urlicht”

    This is from Solti’s magnificent recording of the Mahler 2nd:

    Long ago, Mira Zakai had made a beautiful recital disc. I was playing it one day about ten years ago, and I looked her up on-line…I found she was teaching at a university in Israel, and her faculty bio included an e-mail address, so I sent her a message to say I was listening to – and loving – her voice. A couple of hours later, she sent me a lovely reply.

    Zakai-Mira-5

    A unique artist, Mira passed away in 2019.

  • Scotto/Carreras ~ BUTTERFLY Love Duet

    Renata Scotto and Jose Carreras sing the love duet from Act I of Puccini’s MADAMA BUTTERFLY from a live performance given at San Francisco in 1974.

  • LA GIOCONDA ~ Barcelona 1978

    gulin gioconda

    Above: Ángeles Gulín as Gioconda and Montserrat Aparici as Cieca

    A slam-bang performance of one of my favorite Italian operas, LA GIOCONDA, from the Liceu, Barcelona, in 1978. The singers simply go at it.

    Watch and listen here.

    Gioconda: Ángeles Gulín; Laura: Bruna Baglioni; Cieca: Montserrat Aparici;  Enzo: Nunzio Todesco; Barnaba: Sabin Markov; Alvise: Ivo Vinco.

    I only heard Ángeles Gulín live once: she sang Valentine in HUGUENOTS at Carnegie Hall in 1969; Beverly Sills was Marguerite de Valois and Tony Poncet was Raoul. Ms. Gulín had an enormous voice and she used it unsparingly.

    This GIOCONDA has the right knives-out, heart-on-sleeve passion. It’s that kind of all-or-nothing opera. As Gioconda sings of her love for Enzo in Act I: “My destiny is this: to love him, or to die!”

    ~ Oberon

  • @ My Met Score Desk for BARBIERE DI SIVIGLIA

    Barbiere_jonathan tichler met opera

    Above: Jack Swanson as Count Almaviva and Andrey Zhilikhovsky as Figaro; a Jonathan Tichler/MET Opera photo

    Author: Oberon

    Saturday May 31st, 2025 matinee – With the exceptions of Aigul Akhmetshina and Alexander Vinogradov, all the singers in this afternoon’s Met matinee of Rossini’s BARBIERE DI SIVIGLIA were new to me: not only had I not heard them before, I hadn’t even heard of them. On the podium, Giacomo Sagripanti was also unfamiliar to me.

    Barbiere_aigul and kalman tichler met opera

    Above: Aigul Akmetshina as Rosina and Peter Kálmán as Dr. Bartolo; a Jonathan Tichler/MET Opera photo

    It turned out to be a very worthwhile afternoon, not just because of the infectious rhythms and sheer brilliance of the score, but it also served to take my mind off – at least for the duration – of a looming domestic falling out. 

    In his Met debut season, Giacomo Sangripanti proved a deft Rossini maestro; his tempi seemed lively but never rushed, he never let the orchestra encroach on the singers volume-wise, and he allowed some added notes and embellishments from the singers, which is always fun. The orchestra played the overture swiftly and brightly and solo passages for oboe, horn, clarinet, and bassoon were all beautifully played.

    Joseph+Lim+Baritone

    The first voice to be heard was that of baritone Joseph Lim as Fiorello, and he made an excellent impression. In the past he has covered some roles at The Met (and he’d sung one of the Flemish Deputies in a DON CARLO I attended); I think he deserves more stage opportunities. After I got home and took a look at some of his on-line photos (there’s one above), I realized he had been at the stage door talking with friends after the performance. I wish I had chatted him up. 

    The lovely orchestral intro to Lindoro’s serenade set the scene for the very appealing singing of Jack Swanson as Count Almaviva, who had just made his Met debut in the opera’s previous performance. His singing is technically neat, with nice phrasing and an enticing dynamic range. The audience took to his singing at once, and he was warmly applaud throughout the performance.

    Mr. Lim’s voicey Fiorello was again heard, and then Figaro, in the person of Andrey Zhilikhovsky opened his afternoon with a fantastic “Largo al factotum” bringing some subtle touches to the familiar piece, along with blooming top notes. He was unfazed by the super-fast tempo of the aria’s final section, polishing it off with a splendid, Met-sized high note. The house rang with cheers from the crowd, who seemed thoroughly engaged in the opera’s every note and word.

    A special bouquet here to the excellent harpsichordist, Liora Maurer, who kept reminding us all afternoon of the instrument’s charm. The big-toned bass voice of  the Hungarian Peter Kálmán asserted itself briefly, and then Mr. Swanson rewarded us with more poised lyricism with “L’amoroso sincero Lindoro”, to which Ms. Akmetshina briefly replied before being whisked from her window. Mssrs. Swanson and Zhilikhovsky now set up their plan to gain access to the Count’s beloved; their duet features some fluent coloratura from the baritone, in which the tenor joins; the pair harmonize to fine effect. Figaro urges the Count to play drunk when they gain admitance to the Bartolo household; the pair have more mirthful, high-speed singing, and then Mr. Swanson tops the first scene off with a golden high note.

    Ms. Akmetshina’s “Una voce poco fa” showed off the warmth and depth of her luscious low range, along with engaging fiorature and some bright top notes; her singing flows on thru her playful warning that anyone who tries to cross her will pay for it. Another excited burst of applause was her reward. Mr. Kálmán’s prodigious bass returns…

    Vinogradov

    …and we then meet the imposingly sung, characterful Don Basilio of Alexander Vinogradov (photo above). His “Calunnia” aria is full of insinuating inflections, but is always sung rather than giving in to buffo-parlando. His thunderous colpa di canone” shook the house, and then a mini-cadenza took his voice high before plunging to the deepest depths…once again, fervent applause burst forth, filling the hall.

    The wonderful Rosina/Figaro duet, “Dunque io son” found Aigul throwing in some extra top notes; Mr. Zhilikhovsky suggested she write a love note to her Lindoro, which – she slyly replies – she’s already done. Their duetting is speedy, laced with humor, and filled with luscious tone.

    I’m beginning to feel the severe chill that almost always affects enjoyment of the opera up in the score desk area. Mr. Kálmán’s “A un dottor della mia sorte” blends power with insinuation in a buffo tour de forceIt concludes with the basso’s perfect pattering and a hilarious finish capped by a massive final note.

    We briefly meet the house-keeper Berta, usually sang by a mezzo but today taken on by soprano Kathleen O’Mara; the change in range will bring some fun in her aria later on. 

    The ensemble “Fredda ed immobile” was the part of the opera I liked most when I first heard it live (as “Frigid and motionless“) at Lake George many, many moons ago. The puttering introduction and Aigul’s chesty lead into the long, riotous Act I finale held my interest, but by now I was literally shivering, so I thought of going home.

    But then a young Frenchman, Guillaume – visiting New York City for the first time – stopped by to chat and next thing I knew, Act II was about to  start.

    Ms. Akhmetshina turned Rosina’s music lesson aria, “Contro un cor” into  a real showpiece, capped by a brilliant top note, whilst Mr. Vinogradov added some extra low notes to Basilio’s music. Mr. Kálmán expressed Dr. Bartolo’s fury vibrantly.

    O'mara

    Ms. O’Mara (above, at the 2024 Operalia competition, where she won 1st prize) added some embellishments to Berta’s aria, along with interpolated top notes, including a real zinger at the end.   

    As the opera moves towards its ending, I must again mention Maestro Sangripati’s excellence; the music truly seemed so alive

    The charming “Zitti, zitti” trio was neatly dispatched by Ms. Akhmetshina and Mssrs. Swanson and Zhilikhovsky, and then the tenor took on the demanding “Cessa di piu resistare” with its beautiful andante, which segues into an elaborate tenorized setting of what sounds very much like the finale of LA CENERENTOLA. Mr. Swanson capped his impressive afternoon with a final top note, superbly sustained, igniting a tumultuous ovation during which each cast member evoked shouts of approval. 

    I very much enjoyed seeing Aigul again after the show, and she signed my program:

    Barbiere signed-1jpg
    I had wanted to meet the other singers, but either I didn’t recognize them in time to approach them, or they seemed preoccupied.

    ~ Oberon

  • Fernando Teixeira’s Stunning PAGLIACCI Prologo

    Teixiera

    The great Brazilian baritone Fernando Teixeira (above) sings a magnificent PAGLIACCI Prologo from a performance given at Rio de Janeiro in 1979. David Machado conducts.

    Listen here.

  • Jo Ann Pickens as Cleopatra

    6a00d8341c4e3853ef026bdecd1436200c-320wi

    American soprano Jo Ann Pickens sings Cleopatra’s two arias from Samuel Barber’s ANTONY & CLEOPATRA: “Give Me Some Music” and “Give Me My Robe, Put on My Crown”.

    The recording is from a live radio broadcast from the 1982 Spoleto Festival. Cal Stewart Kellogg conducts the Spoleto Festival Orchestra.

    Listen here:

  • Shostakovich Sonatas @ Carnegie Hall

    Shostakovich

    ~ Author: Oberon

    Wednesday May 28th, 2025 – Evgeny Kissin was joined by three renowned string soloists for a program of Shostakovich sonatas this evening at Carnegie Hall. It was one of the most thrilling concerts I have ever attended. The atmosphere in the Hall was palpable; aside from some cellphones going off at the the wrong moments, silence reigned. The musicians seemed bent on preventing applause between movements, keeping their bows poised over the strings in order to sustain the atmosphere. The three sonatas were presented in order of their composition: cello first (1934), followed by the violin (1968), with the viola (1975) played following the interval.

    Gautier Capuçon and Mr. Kissin strode onto the Carnegie Hall stage to a warm greeting. Dmitri Shostakovich’s Cello Sonata in D-minor, Op. 40, was composed composed during a period of political and social upheaval in the Soviet Union, and the music reflects the unsettled atmosphere of the time…and of ours, now. The cellist sometimes allowed a touch of grittiness into his tone, which was truly evocative.

    The opening Allegro non troppo is gently introduced by Mr. Kissin at the Steinway. A lovely theme gives way to vivid animation from both players. The mood gets dreamy, with M. Capuçon taking up a gorgeous cello melody that turns passionate. A super-pianissimo moment briefly interrupts the music’s flow, and then a sense of longing grows from repeated cello tones, displaying Mr. Capuçon’s marvelous control. Plucking introduces a dance, and mood swings continue – one such bringing a haunting theme: quiet and mysterious. Single notes from the piano invite deep cello playing; Kissin’s tone takes on an almost grumpy sound. Fantastic!

    Staying in an Allegro mode, scintillating piano and dancing cello illuminate the second movement. Cello glissandi and insistent keyboard rhythms pop up as the dance sails onward. A sudden stop, and then the Largo commences with incredibly hushed music from M. Capuçon’s cello. The players’ quiet intensity creates a mysterious atmosphere. The cello tears at my heart, rising from its lowest range in music filled with longing and then bursting with passion before returning to the depths. A remarkable quietude fills the Hall, then a crescendo before a fade-out, with the piano on high longing for peace. Things darken; spellbinding control from both musicians casts a spell over us.

    With dancing motifs played as if compelled by an unseen force, the final Allegro lets us savour Mr. Kissin’s glorious virtuosity, whilst M. Capuçon produces an amazing stuttering effect with his cello as these two paragons delight us with their magical partnership, bringing the first of the concert’s enthusiastic ovations.

    Gidon Kremer walked out onto the Carnegie stage cautiously, to an welcome. Now 78 (two years older than myself!), the legendary violinist responded to Menthisiastic r. Kissin’s straightforward piano introduction of the Shostakovich opus 134 with a sinuous theme. For a while, simple musical lines are exchanged, and then a sprightly dance emerges. The music is subtly playful until there’s a rise of passion. The buzzy tone of the violin then resumes the dance, somewhat hesitantly. The high-register violin filigree creates an insectuous sound before a slow fade-away.

    The ensuing Allegretto opens with a nervous dance; this movement is lively, witty, and ironic. It’s music that veers high and dips low, with some sparkly effects from the violin. A sense of urgency takes over as the music presses forward, Kissin playing high and bright as Mr. Kremer handles the music with with amazing dexterity. The violin whines, the piano swirls onward: high, fast, phenomenal music-making!

    The sonata concludes with a Largo, the pianist striking single, dotty notes as the violinist plucks away. Mr. Kremer’s playing turns ethereal, poised on high with amazing control. A keyboard dance rhythm draws restless playing from the violin. Now Mr. Kissin introduces a sense of grandeur into the music, leading to an angular violin cadenza. A rocking motif from both players carries them into a series of tremelos as the sonata ends. The Kremer/Kissin duo elicited a fervent ovation from the crowd.  

    After the interval, an artist new to me – the Ukrainian-British violist/conductor Maxim Rysanov – joined Mr. Kissin for a revelatory performance of the Shostakovich Viola Sonata, opus 147. This fascinating work, which I have only heard played live two or three times previously, really got to my soul tonight: the kind of deeply immersive musical experience that happens so rarely. 

    The opening Moderato begins very quietly, with soft viola plucking – slow and pensive – as the piano joins, dark and rather ominous. A dirge-like sense of foreboding develops leading to a burst of power. Restlessness overtakes the music; a piano solo and eerie, shivering resonances from the viola develop into a flash of grandeur before an extraordinarily subtle viola passage is heard, ending with staccati, and a sustained fading away.

    Now comes the Allegretto, commencing with a dance à la Russe. Mr. Rysanov’s playing is so suave and assured. Boldness from the Kissin keyboard and plucking from the violist lead to a heartfelt unison song, which gets quite grand.

    After a pause, the Adagio commences with a sorrowing viola theme which gains poignant support from the piano. Every note from both players seemed like a thing of value, something to treasure…such incredible playing. The spirit of Beethoven hovers on the air as the rhythmic signature of the Moonlight Sonata casts its spell overall. A viola cadenza – lovingly fashioned by Mr. Rysanov – draws us on to the sonata’s magnificent finish. Throughout this movement, I had been in another time and place, far from the chaotic madness of the world. A massive, roaring standing ovation filled the Hall, and it was still resounding as we emerged into the downpour…

    ~ Oberon

  • Egon Schiele Goes to Prison

    ~ The Austrian Expressionist has been having a moment with gallery goers. Now his life is an opera.

    by Andrew Kupfer

    Schiele in prison

    In 1963, when she was 29, Alessandra Comini was in Neulengbach, Austria, hunting for Egon Schiele. Or rather for his prison cell. An art historian, Comini was in the country for graduate school, and she knew that in 1912, long before the Nazis dubbed his art degenerate, Schiele had been jailed for obscenity—the only European painter ever to have been imprisoned for his work. She also knew from his prison diaries that his basement cell had bars widely enough spaced to toss an orange between them, as Schiele’s lover had done when he was incarcerated. And on this day she had a hunch the old municipal building she was standing before was the right place. She approached the caretaker. He refused to let her in, claiming the former cells held important government papers.

    She left, but loitered nearby. At lunch she noticed a stream of workers leaving the building. “So I did what we used to do to sneak into the movies when we were kids,” she told me. “I stood in the crowd as they exited and slowly walked backwards into the building.” She popped down the stairs and found six doors. On the inside of the second were the carved initials of Schiele’s predecessor, just like in one of Schiele’s prison watercolors. She had found it. As she was leaving, she looked for the government documents. “There were no papers,” she recalls. “Only firewood.”

    Ten years later, that story led to a book, Schiele in Prison, her first of three about the artist. And now that book has inspired an opera by Jared Schwartz, 43, the all-around musical polymath who composed the score and wrote the libretto.

    Jared 3

    Above: Jared Schwartz

    A century after he created them, Schiele’s paintings still have the power to shock. They are unflinching, raw, frank, and altogether unsettling, and they challenge the visitor to experience emotions one usually doesn’t feel when viewing a painting, like disgust. In a way, they are car-crash art: one can hardly bear to look and yet one cannot look away. Drama is inherent in the images.

    What better subject for an opera?

    The project came to fruition about four years ago when a friend and collaborator of Schwartz introduced him to Comini, who broached the idea of an opera. The more he heard the more he liked it. He began composing, meeting with Comini once or twice a week to talk through their ideas. And she provided him with a budget. With that funding, and with the Neue Gallery in New York as a presenting partner, Schwartz mounted a workshop production of Schiele in Prison in January. And I got to see the rehearsals.

    How I happened to be there was a bit of serendipity. Schwartz was staying with an old friend of mine while he was running the rehearsals, and I passed on word that I’d love to sit in one day. I was struggling to write a show of my own and was hoping to see first-hand how an opera might come together. He kindly wrote to say I could come to whatever rehearsals I wished. I think both he and I were surprised that I ended up coming to all of them, every day for two weeks. But after the first rehearsal, I was curious to see what happened next, and after the second or third came a compulsion to see how it all turned out. The singers seemed to accept me as part of the furniture. And here I was with a thrilling opportunity—to witness a group of supremely talented people at the top of their profession as they created a work of art.

     

    Any opera goer can tell you of the electrifying moment when a well-tuned chorus reaches full voice and fills a hall with sound. To encounter those vocal forces in a small rehearsal studio from a distance of three feet is an altogether different experience. Within two seconds, the thoughts going through my head in quick succession are (1) OHMYGOD THAT’S LOUD (2) People can do that? (3) Is this safe?

    It was also gorgeous. And art isn’t supposed to be safe anyway. In other words, this first impression is a good aural metaphor for Schiele’s art. Schiele in Prison aims to subvert the common conception of the painter as a twisted curio, showing him as a courageous idealist. And that changes how we see the paintings.

    The opera opens in the basement cell where Schiele served his sentence—and where Schwartz spent a night to steep in the atmosphere. He likens the experience to being in a tomb. “It was terrifying,” Schwartz says. “Schiele was only there for 24 days, but for the first 21, he didn’t know how long he would stay. I knew I could leave, but even so I felt panicked and choked.” Along with Schiele’s prison diaries, the visit informed Schwartz’s libretto.

    From there Schwartz moves back in time through the watershed events in Schiele’s life. First Schiele (played in the workshop by Colin Levin) and his younger sister (Christa Dalmazio) try to navigate their fraught childhood in a home dominated by an unbalanced father who had conversations with people who weren’t there. Schiele then bristles against the orthodoxies of art school, impulsively quitting and seeking the mentorship of Gustav Klimt (Bert Johnson). He visits his lover, Max Oppenheimer (Hans Tashjian), an artist, who laments that Schiele doesn’t have the courage to be open about his bisexuality. The scene shifts to the flat he shares with his other lover, Wally (Soon Cho), his model and muse; she would be with him during the pivotal event of the story, when police arrive in search of a young girl who had earlier taken shelter there. The police find not the girl but Schiele’s paintings. “What is this filth?” ask the police. “My art,” replies Schiele simply, again and again.

    Next comes the wild heart of the opera, a kaleidoscopic spectacle in which the cast morph into townspeople attending a show of Schiele’s art. As they gather at the gallery, they hold masks to their faces in a display of piety. They lower them as they are seized by deliriously obscene desires, accosting Schiele’s agent to buy one or another of the erotic works that best fits their masturbatory, armpit-licking fantasies. The ensemble leaves the scene en masse, swirling from the gallery into Schiele’s jail cell, at which point the audience will realize that the scenes from Schiele’s life had all been conjured by the artist as he sat in prison. The opera ends as it began, with Schiele, defiant, defending his art.

     

    I don’t think of high school very often, but during the fortnight of rehearsals I remember a lesson in my physics class on the difference between constructive and destructive interference in sound. When sound waves from two sources—a tenor and a baritone, say—are perfectly in synch, they combine, producing a larger crest and delivering a louder sound than the sum of the two waves on their own. If they are even slightly out of synch, with one wave sliding toward its trough as the other peaks, they partially cancel each other out, and the perceived sound diminishes, which is one reason why a professional chorus can sound louder than a chorus of talented amateurs three times its size.

    It is that synchronic confluence of voices that nearly knocks me out of my seat on the first day of rehearsals. What follows from that salvo is a primer on how to mount a show, which, for anyone interested in process, is fascinating in its granular detail and has me canceling all my other plans for two weeks. The rehearsals start with the gallery scene, musically the most demanding in the show, with almost the entire ensemble in action. Each day brings a new section, with the action usually returning to the gallery scene in any spare moment. Emphasis shifts throughout. The early days focus on musical phrasing and clarity of diction—bite off your words so the listener can tell when they end, music director Richard Cordova, cajoles the players again and again—which, with 11 people singing at once, is a challenge. When they do, the sound pops.

    That the cast’s voices align so well is a function of how Schwartz worked with them in the weeks before the group rehearsals, meeting with the singers one-on-one to go over their parts. If something didn’t sit well with their voice, Schwartz made revisions to the score at the piano as they rehearsed. These deft on-the-fly touches helped give the singing its power.

    As the rehearsals progress, the focus widens to take in dramatic presentation, fine-tuning gesture and attitude. Jim Brown, the staging director, works with Schiele’s demented father to sharpen his insanity. “Sometimes you glance over to your family when you’re supposed to be talking to your imaginary guests,” says Brown. “It seems like you’re talking to your wife.” David Mejia, as the father, adjusts, boring in on his phantoms.

    Over the course of the first week, Brown layers in blocking and choreography, with movements that are clever enough to add doses of attitude and humor but simple enough for a group of non-dancers to master quickly. In the gallery scene, he deploys the cast for an assault on the sensibilities of a prim and proper Vienna. “In the third bar of the fanfare the lights will come up,” he explains. “You can’t wait to see this debased art. You run in and see the audience, and you stop dead. You put up your masks because you don’t want them to see you.” Brown has them march in time to the music, and, as they sing “We are the people who Run. This. Town!” they point to themselves on each word, a gesture that gives the crew a collective moxie. Whenever they walk backward—which is often—they lean forward, and when they move ahead, they lean back. “Contraporto!” Brown exclaims. “Remember, the more precise it is, the funnier it is.”

    Indeed, if the earlier scenes are alternately harrowing and moving, the gallery scene is raucous fun. Brown encourages improvisation. “We want various sexy poses,” he says. “So meet your scene partners!” The tableau instantly transforms into a Bosch painting, if the figures in a Bosch painting could bump and grind. A soprano immediately stands behind a tenor and bends him forward at the waist. Another duo entwine limbs and gyrate as they hocket. Later, during a solo, a tenor gives a pelvic thrust. “And when you say ‘erotic’, you need another pelvic thrust,” says Brown. “More pelvic thrusts!” Each time they run the scene, the improv is different, and just a bit raunchier, and it’s a hoot to see how inventively the cast use dramatic muscles opera singers don’t often get to flex.

    In week two, rehearsals move to the performance venue, and a string quartet joins the company, marking the first time all the singers and musicians are in the same place at the same time—the so-called sitzprobe, or seated rehearsal, where the entire ensemble gathers to run through the music. It’s the one day of rehearsals I miss; I have finally come down with the fluey illness that has been tearing through the cast, forcing a few to rehearse by Zoom some days. The new venue is as different from a dank basement prison cell as you can imagine—an urban sky mansion in the old headquarters building of the Carl Fischer music publishers, now condominiums, this one the property of Jim St. George and Mark Sullivan, tech philanthropists who frequently use the space to help creators mount workshop productions of new shows.

    Schwartz is now at the keyboard—which will be his station for the performances—and he is worried about the balance between the piano and the strings; he plays with enough power to drown out the quartet if he doesn’t take care. In fact, he had been on track to be a concert pianist till he was 18 and damaged the tendons in his right wrist playing tennis, necessitating surgery; it was months before he could play again, and the wrist was never the same. “It’s my first string quartet,” he confesses. “But I started playing the violin when I was 5. And then the viola. And then the cello.” Wait—you play the violin, the viola, the cello, and the piano? “And the French horn, too. And a whole bunch of other instruments,” he says. He’s also a singer, a lyrical bass. “I’ve just really loved music since I was 3.”

    Tweaks and adjustments continue through the dress rehearsals. Brown adapts the choreography to the new space. It’s a vast, open-plan layout, but there are some immovable obstacles—on the left a marble coffee table that reminds me of the altar in The Brutalist (if you haven’t seen The Brutalist, it’s a hunk of Carrara marble that had to be winched into place), on the right a kitchen island. In the dress rehearsal, the pace picks up, with no time to work passages and with tweaks made on the spot.

    During a run-through of the phantasmagoric fifth scene, Schwartz declares from the piano: “You’re getting this wrong every single time!” Someone was singing the old version of a passage that Schwartz had changed a few days before. He repeats the section, and suddenly dashes from the keyboard to the choral scrum with the hint of a smile and sticks his ear an inch from the mouth of each vocalist, like the round, flat mike in a recording session. He returns to the keyboard mollified; he’s a perfectionist. “I knew I had to do something outrageous to get their attention,” he admits later. “As a music director, I have very high standards, and I offer high support. I also have a lot of fun.” Schwartz agrees with my impression that the singers were having fun too. “Every single person in the cast really wanted to be there. They really wanted the show to work,” Schwartz says. “That’s not normal. Usually most people are there to do the gig.”

    Performance day arrives. Well suited to the venue are the plummy complement of invited guests. A good number of them have come from Austria. The cast negotiate the obstacles and sail past the odd glitch and dropped line with no one in the audience who hadn’t sat through 50 hours of rehearsal any the wiser. “All I could hear is every wrong note I played at the piano,” Schwartz tells me afterwards. “But the piece is compelling and powerful, even in a living room, even in rushed circumstances.” The first show marks the birthday of Professor Comini. At the end Colin Levin, who plays Schiele, pulls her up to take a bow with the cast. She nearly topples over—she is 90 that day—but she holds her ground, as she did all those years before in Neulengbach.

    Now come revisions and the hard graft of finding backers and a producer. Europe is the most likely site for a fully staged performance; the opera is a little too racy for, say, Texas. Schwartz plans to restore some material that he removed for the workshop performances. “I tamed it down. I didn’t want penises out in Mark and Jim’s living room. It’s too small a space,” he says. “But all the nudity and masturbation will have to be there for Europe. I’ll have to get back into the score and make it scandalous again.”

    So more creative tests lie ahead. A workshop—even a terrifically exciting one—is just a first step.

    ~ Andrew Kupfer is a writer and editor in New York City.